← All Playbooks
Run 3–5 weeks
Operationalize AI Governance for CS
Establish a written Responsible AI policy for CS operations covering PII handling, human-review requirements, adoption standards, and impact measurement.
Why This Matters
Run-stage teams have CSMs experimenting with AI individually: different tools, different practices, inconsistent outcomes. Some are pasting customer data into public LLMs. Some are sending AI drafts without review. Without a governance layer, you accumulate risk as adoption grows. A clear policy isn't about slowing AI adoption; it's about scaling it safely and measuring whether it actually improves outcomes.
Action Plan
- 01 Audit current AI tool usage across the CS team: which tools, which use cases, how often, and what review practices CSMs follow today
- 02 Draft a PII policy: specify which customer data can be entered into AI tools, which tools are approved, and which are prohibited (e.g., no personal contact data into non-approved public LLMs)
- 03 Define human-review requirements by use case: customer-facing content requires CSM review before sending; internal summaries can be used as-is
- 04 Create a list of approved AI tools with their data processing terms verified by your legal or security team
- 05 Run a one-hour team training session covering: approved tools, PII rules, prompt hygiene, and how to catch hallucinations
- 06 Set an AI adoption baseline: what percentage of CSMs use AI tools weekly? Track this monthly going forward
- 07 Measure impact quarterly: time saved, accuracy of AI outputs, and whether AI-assisted interactions correlate with better customer outcomes
Metrics to Watch
Related Principles
Common Pitfalls
- Writing a policy and filing it away. Governance only works if it's enforced and reviewed as tools evolve
- Blocking all AI use in the name of safety. This pushes usage underground where you have even less visibility
- Measuring AI governance by tool adoption alone. Adoption without outcome measurement tells you nothing about whether AI is helping or hurting